In all gift-giving traditions there is in fact, an equal or opposite effect upon the giver as with the receiver. The giver, even with charity or volunteering opportunities experiences feelings of fulfillment even without reciprocal gifting. Though return is “expected” in modern society, most of all the acknowledgment of well-doing is probably the more desirable reciprocation.
The philanthropy of Home Depot is a great representation of strategic giving, by incorporating employee participation into their charitable conquests they are not only presenting the company in a desirable light, but showing that their corporation as a whole are world conscious. These qualified employees have understanding of the materials used and are successfully building homes for those in need. This reflects well upon Home Depot’s company persona.
Exxon/Mobile utilizes their logo and giving scope which can also be considered strategic, though not in the same way that Home Depot has done so. They support tigers and their environment simply because of the logo that they use. A more strategic charity opportunity such as cleaning up after off-shore oil drilling could be considered and would correlate more directly with what the company as a whole actual is.
Rumors, a local Richmond used clothing boutique has a strategically placed clothing drop box for charity outside of their storefront. I consider this to be a realm of strategic giving because it is so convenient for patrons to donate what they can’t sell to Rumors as consignment. To be able to not only profit from used clothes, but utilize the consumer’s unneeded extra articles of clothing for charity is as strategic as it gets.
